4.4 Article

Ferulic acid prevents the cerebral ischemic injury-induced decrease of Akt and Bad phosphorylation

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 507, 期 2, 页码 156-160

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.12.012

关键词

Ferulic acid; Neuroprotection, Akt; Bad; 14-3-3

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea Government (MEST) [2010-0007881]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0007881] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ferulic acid protects neuronal cells from glutamate-induced excitotoxicity and focal cerebral ischemia. This study investigated whether ferulic acid exerts a neuroprotective effect through the activation of Akt and its downstream targets, Bad and 14-3-3. Adult male rats were immediately treated with ferulic acid (100 mg/kg, i.v.) after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Brains were collected 24 h after MCAO and infarct volumes were analyzed using triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. It was found that ferulic acid treatment significantly reduced infarct volume during MCAO. Ferulic acid attenuated the MCAO injury-induced decrease of phospho-PDK1, phospho-Akt and phospho-Bad levels. However, ferulic acid did not affect the expression of 14-3-3 and Bcl-xL, which exerts an anti-apoptotic effect through interaction with phospho-Bad. Immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated that the interaction between phospho-Bad and 14-3-3 decreased during MCAO, whereas ferulic acid prevented the injury-induced decrease in these interaction levels. Moreover, ferulic acid prevented the injury-induced increase in cleaved caspase-3 levels. These findings suggest that ferulic acid attenuates cell death during MCAO and that these protective effects are due to inhibition of Akt signaling pathway inactivation and maintenance of the interaction between phospho-Bad and 14-3-3. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据