4.4 Article

Mapping of the binding sites for the OX1 orexin receptor antagonist, SB-334867, using orexin/hypocretin receptor chimaeras

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 506, 期 1, 页码 111-115

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.10.061

关键词

Orexin; Hypocretin; OX1 receptor; OX2 receptor; SB-334867

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation
  3. University of Helsinki
  4. Drug Discovery Graduate School (DDGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The binding sites for agonists and antagonist of orexin receptors are not know, hampering progressive drug design approaches. In the current study, we utilized chimaeric orexin receptor approach to map the receptor areas contributing to the selectivity of the classical antagonist, SB-334867, for OX1 receptors. Altogether ten chimaeras between OX1 and OX2 orexin receptors were utilized. The receptors were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells. The ability (K-B) of SB-334867 to inhibit orexin-A-induced inositol phosphate release (phospholipase C activity) was measured. The results, in synthesis, suggest that there are several possible interactions contributing to the high affinity binding, all of which are not required simultaneously. This is indicated by the fact that most of the chimaeras display affinity (at least somewhat) higher than OX2. As previously shown for the agonist distinction, the second quarter of the receptor, from the C-terminal part of the transmembrane helix 2 to the transmembrane helix 4 seems to be most central also for SB-334867 binding, but also the third quarter, from the transmembrane helix 4 to the transmembrane helix 6 is able to contribute (and compensate for loss of other sites). A previous study has suggested that amino acids conserved between OX1 and OX2 receptors would somehow confer selectivity for subtype-selective antagonists. In contrast to previous findings, our results indicate that the amino acids distinct between the receptor subtypes are in key position. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据