4.4 Article

Protective effects of resveratrol through the up-regulation of SIRT1 expression in the mutant hSOD1-G93A-bearing motor neuron-like cell culture model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 503, 期 3, 页码 250-255

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.047

关键词

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Resveratrol; Nicotinamide; Sirtuin; Mitochondria biogenesis

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [81030019, 30871359]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7082099, 7102161]
  3. Capital Medical Technology Development Foundation [SF-2009-III-34]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resveratrol has recently been widely reported to be an age-delaying and neuroprotective compound, and it appears to produce these benefits by activating silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1). However, the role that SIRT1 activation plays in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains unclear. In the present study. SIRT1 expression was found to be much lower in the mutant hSOD1G93A-bearing VSC4.1 cells compared to hSOD1wt cells when both were cultured in low-serum medium, indicating the involvement of SIRT1 activation defects in the pathogenesis of ALS under energetic stress. Further investigation revealed that a 24-h treatment with 0.5-20 mu M resveratrol had a dose-dependent protective effect on this ALS cell model, and the effects of resveratrol on increasing cell viability, preventing cell apoptosis and elevating cellular ATP levels through promoting mitochondria biogenesis were blocked by SIRT1 inhibition. This further demonstrated a role for SIRT1 activation in the protection of neuronal cells from degeneration. These findings suggest that resveratrol can protect the ALS cell model from mutant SOD1-mediated toxicity through up-regulating the expression of SIRT1, which represents a potential therapeutic target for preventing the motor neuron degeneration in ALS patients. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据