4.4 Article

Neurocognitive effects of first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs in early-stage schizophrenia: A naturalistic 12-month follow-up study

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 503, 期 2, 页码 141-146

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.027

关键词

Neurocognitive; Antipsychotic; Early-stage; Schizophrenia

资金

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Program in the 10th 5-year-plan of China [2004BA720A22]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30900485]
  3. National R&D Special Fund for Health Profession [201002003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to assess the cognitive effects of first- and second-generation antipsychotics on neurocognition under naturalistic treatment conditions. In a 12-month, open-label, multicenter study, 698 patients with early-stage schizophrenia (duration of illness <= 5 years) were prescribed chlorpromazine, sulpiride, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or aripiprazole monotherapy. A neuropsychological battery including tests of attention, processing speed, learning/memory, and executive functioning was administered at baseline, 6- and 12-months. The primary outcome was change in a cognitive composite score after 12-months of treatment. At 12 months, treatment resulted in mild to moderate neurocognitive improvements of z = 0.32 for chlorpromazine, 0.33 for sulpiride, 0.43 for clozapine, 0.51 for risperidone, 0.69 for olanzapine, 0.64 for quetiapine and 0.46 for aripiprazole. However, the olanzapine and quetiapine groups demonstrated greater improvement in the composite score and processing speed than did the chlorpromazine and sulpiride groups. Both first- and second-generation antipsychotics may improve cognitive function in patients with early-stage schizophrenia. Given that some neurocognitive improvement is attributable to a practice effect, any improvement is likely to be in the range of a small effect size. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据