4.4 Article

Noradrenaline-induced spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents in mouse basolateral nucleus of amygdala pyramidal neurons: Comparison with dopamine-induced currents

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 480, 期 3, 页码 167-172

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.001

关键词

Noradrenaline; Dopamine; GABA; Spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic current; Amygdala; Mouse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) receives both noradrenergic and dopaminergic projections. These projections are thought to be important for modulation of amygdala neural circuits. In BLA pyramidal neurons, noradrenaline (NA) is known to facilitate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) through excitation of interneurons. Dopamine (DA) also is known to facilitate GABAergic sIPSCs in pyramidal neurons of the amygdala region including the BLA. It is unclear which neurotransmitter, NA or DA, is predominant in facilitating sIPSC in the BLA. Whether NA and DA facilitate sIPSC in different or the same pyramidal neurons also remains unknown. Herein, we employed the patch clamp recording technique on BLA pyramidal neurons in mouse brain slices, and compared the facilitating actions of NA and DA on sIPSCs. First NA and then DA, or first DA and then NA, were applied to a slice. NA enhanced sIPSC frequency in the majority (80-90%) of pyramidal neurons tested, whereas DA enhanced sIPSC frequency in relatively few neurons (approximately 30%). Neurons responding to NA alone and DA alone accounted, respectively, for 54.3% and 2.9% of the pyramidal neurons tested (11.4% of neurons responded to neither NA nor DA). Pyramidal neurons in which NA and DA both facilitated sIPSCs accounted for 31.4% of neurons tested. These results suggest that NA facilitates GABAergic sIPSCs in a larger proportion of mouse BLA pyramidal neurons than DA. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据