4.4 Article

Fluoxetine treatment induces dose dependent alterations in depression associated behavior and neural plasticity in female mice

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 484, 期 1, 页码 12-16

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.084

关键词

Neurogenesis; Antidepressants; Sex differences; Depression; Behavior

资金

  1. USPHS [MH86599]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antidepressant-induced increases in neurogenesis and neurotrophin mobilization in rodents and primates are proposed to be necessary for behavioral efficacy The current study examines the relationship between the effects of fluoxetine treatment on behavior, cell proliferation and the neurotrophin BDNF in females. Female MRL/MpJ mice were treated acutely (5 and 10 mg/kg) or chronically (25.5 and 10 mg/kg bid.) with fluoxetine and tested in the tail suspension test (TST) and or novelty-Induced hypophagia test (NIH), respectively Mice treated chronically with fluoxetine received 4 (100 mg/kg) injections of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) on the last 4 days of treatment to measure DNA synthesis The other half of the hippocampus and the frontal cortex was removed and examined for BDNF levels Fluoxetine treatment decreased immobility in the TST and latency to eat in the NIH test, but only the highest dose of fluoxetine significantly altered behavior in both tests Chronic treatment with 5 and 10 mg/kg of fluoxetine significantly increased cell proliferation and BDNF levels in the hippocampus Only chronic treatment with the highest of fluoxetine increased BDNF levels in the frontal cortex Behavioral measures in the NIH test correlated with BDNF levels in the frontal cortex but not in the hippocampus or with cell proliferation in the hippocampus These data suggest that females require high doses of fluoxetine for behavioral efficacy regardless of elevations of neurogenesis and BDNF mobilization in the hippocampus Elevations in BDNF levels in the frontal cortex are related to the behavioral efficacy of fluoxetine (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据