4.4 Article

Impairments in cognition and resting-state connectivity of the hippocampus in elderly subjects with type 2 diabetes

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 473, 期 1, 页码 5-10

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.057

关键词

Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Hippocampus; Cognitive function; Functional magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30770779 ZZ, 30825014 ZZ]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB512308 ZZ]
  3. National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2007AA0200Z435 ZZ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease, which involves hippocampus-mediated cognitive impairment. The present study investigated whether the resting-state functional connectivity of the hippocampus would be changed in patients with T2DM. A region of interest-based resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach was applied to explore functional connectivity differences between 21 elderly patients with T2DM and 19 well-matched healthy controls, with all participants assessed by multi-dimensional neuropsychological tests. We found that T2DM patients performed significantly worse in the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) (especially for Delayed Recall and Recognition) and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) when compared with the control group, and cognitive function was negatively related to BMI and HbA(1c). Importantly, the hippocampus showed reduced functional connectivity bilaterally to widespread regions, including fusiform gyrus, frontal gyrus, temporal gyrus, anterior cingulate gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, posterior cingulate gyrus, precuneus and inferior parietal lobule in T2DM patients compared to healthy controls. T2DM is associated with an impaired pattern of default network function, and the specific disconnection pattern identified may be involved in the neuropathophysiology of this disease. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据