4.4 Article

The extinction of morphine-induced conditioned place preference by histone deacetylase inhibition

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 483, 期 2, 页码 137-142

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.080

关键词

Extinction; Morphine; Conditioned place preference; Histone deacetylase inhibition

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [30873440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms have an important role in the development of addictive behavior. However, little is known about the role of epigenetic mechanisms in the extinction of morphine-induced behavioral changes. In this study, we will examine the effect of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors on extinction of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). To facilitate extinction, rats will be administered an HDAC inhibitor (HDACi) following nonreinforced exposure to the conditioned context. To measure persistence, rats were subject to a reinstatement test using 3 mg/kg dose of morphine. To exclude the effect of repeated NaBut injections themselves on morphine-CPP in the absence of extinction session, rats received injection of either NaBut or vehicle for 8 days. We found that HDAC inhibition during nonconfined extinction or confined extinction consolidation can facilitate extinction of morphine-induced CPP. We also showed that the extinction of drug seeking via HDAC inhibition modulates extinction learning such that reinstatement behavior is significantly attenuated. There is no effect of repeated NaBut injections themselves on morphine-CPP in the absence of extinction session. In conclusion, our results extend earlier reports on the ability of HDACi to modify the behavioral effects of drugs of abuse. Our increasing understanding of these epigenetic mechanisms will provide key answers to basic processes in drug addiction and hopefully provide insight into designing improved treatments for drug addiction. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据