4.4 Article

Functional organization of the human anterior insular cortex

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 457, 期 2, 页码 66-70

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.101

关键词

Anterior insular cortex; Subregions; Meta-analysis; Co-activation; Amygdala

资金

  1. Heidelberg Academy of Science and Humanities
  2. German Federal Ministry of Educaiton and Research
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation
  4. [01GQ0420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human insular cortex is involved in a wide range of functions including motor control, language, and homeostatic regulation. Little is known, however, how these functions are topographically organized in the insular cortex and how they are functionally related to the amygdala, which is anatomically connected to the insular cortex. We have investigated these questions by conducting an activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis of previously published neuroimaging studies reporting insula effects. We find auditory and language tasks to preferentially activate an area in the dorsal part of the anterior insular cortex (AIC). Motor tasks involving both the upper and lower extremity reproducibly activated a posterior AIC region, adjacent to the sulcus centralis insulae (SCI). Significant co-activation with the probabilistically defined amygdala was located in the ventral AIC where also responses related to peripheral physiological changes were repeatedly reported. These findings show that the human AIC is a functionally differentiated brain region. The dorsal region of the AIC may be involved in auditory-motor integration, while the ventral part of the AIC may interface the amygdala with insular regions involved in the regulation of physiological changes related to emotional states. Thus, the present findings provide insights into the organization of human AIC and a methodological approach that may be further used to refine the emerging functional map of the insular cortex. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据