4.4 Article

Protective effect of bromocriptine against BH4-induced Cath.a cell death involving up-regulation of antioxidant enzymes

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 451, 期 3, 页码 185-189

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.056

关键词

Antioxidant enzyme; Bromocriptine; Cath.a; Nrf2; Parkinson's disease; Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4)

资金

  1. Korean Government (MOEHRD, Basic Research Promotion Fund) [KRF-2006-003-E00434]
  2. Brain Research Center of the 21st Century Frontier Research Program of the Ministry of Science Technology [M103KV010011-08K2201-01110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously, we suggested that tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), an obligatory cofactor for dopamine synthesis, as an intrinsic contributor to dopaminergic neuron vulnerability. The BH4 toxicity is observed in dopamine-producing cells, including Cath.a cells, but not in non-dopaminergic cells. Furthermore, the dopaminergic cell death induced by BH4 is apoptotic in nature and involves oxidative stress, similar to that observed in Parkinson's disease. Accordingly, various antioxidants have been found to protect dopaminergic cells from BH4. This study was undertaken to evaluate protective effects of the dopamine receptor agonist bromocriptine on BH4-induced Cath.a cell death, because bromocriptine has been reported to be an antioxidant with a neuroprotective activity. In the presence of bromocriptine, the increase in LDH activity and mitochondrial cytochrome c release induced by BH4 were significantly abolished. This cytoprotective effect was phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway-dependent. In addition, bromocriptine was found to up-regulate the expressions of nuclear factor-E2-related factor-2 and antioxidant enzymes including NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1. Our findings show that bromocriptine stimulates antioxidant defense mechanisms in Cath.a cells and suggest a potential use of bromocriptine as a neuroprotectant. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据