4.4 Article

Local administration of a cannabinoid agonist alters norepinephrine efflux in the rat frontal cortex

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 431, 期 1, 页码 1-5

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.009

关键词

WIN 55,212-2; reverse microdialysis; locus coeruleus

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA009082, R01 DA020129, DA 09082, K02 DA015395-05, R01 DA020129-04, DA 020129, R01 DA009082-07, K02 DA015395, R01 DA020129-04S1, R01 DA009082-06S2, DA 15395] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol, the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, activates specific cannabinoid (CB) receptors to exert complex actions on modulatory neurotransmitters involved in attention and cognition. Previous research has demonstrated that systemic administration of the synthetic cannabinoid agonist, WIN55,212-2, increases norepinephrine efflux in the frontal cortex. The distribution of CB1 receptors on noradrenergic fibers in the frontal cortex suggests this may be one potential site for the regulation of norepinephrine release. In the present study, we first examined the ability of a CB1 antagonist, applied locally in the frontal cortex of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, to block the actions of systemic WIN 55,212-2. Pretreatment with SR 141716A (300 mu M) significantly attenuated the excitatory effects of WIN 55,212-2 (15 mg/kg, i.p.). Next, the impact of direct perfusion of WIN 55,212-2 into the frontal cortex on extracellular norepinephrine efflux was measured. Direct application of WIN 55,212-2 (100 mu M) into the frontal cortex elicited a significant increase in extracellular norepinephrine efflux suggesting that activation of cortical cannabinoid receptors contributes to alterations in norepinephrine levels in this brain region. Finally, local administration of SR 141716A followed by local administration of WIN 55,212-2 revealed a paradoxical inhibition of norepinephrine efflux. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据