4.4 Article

Functional characterization of tyrosine transport in fibroblast cells from healthy controls

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 434, 期 1, 页码 56-60

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.01.028

关键词

human fibroblasts; tyrosine and alanine transport; LAT1; LAT2; LAT3; LAT4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human fibroblast cells are an advantageous model to study the transport of amino acids across cell membranes, since one can control the environmental factors. A major problem in all earlier studies is the lack of precise and detailed knowledge regarding the expression and functionality of tyrosine transporters in human fibroblasts. This motivated us to perform a systematic functional characterization of the tyrosine transport in fibroblast cells with respect to the isoforms of system-L (LAT1, LAT2, LAT3, LAT4), which is the major transporter of tyrosine. Ten (n = 10) fibroblast cell lines from healthy volunteers were included in the study. Uptake of L-[U-C-14] tyrosine in fibroblasts was measured using the cluster tray method in the presence and absence of excess concentrations of various combinations of inhibitors. This study demonstrated that LAT1 is involved in 90% of total uptake of tyrosine and also around 51% of alanine. Not more than 10% can be accounted for by LAT2, LAT3 and LAT4 isoforms. LAT2 seems to be functionally weak in uptake of tyrosine while LAT3 and LAT4 contributed around 7%. 10% could be contributed by system-A (ATA2 isoform). Alanine consequently inhibited the tyrosine transport by up to 60%. Tyrosine transport through the LAT1 isoform has a higher affinity compared to system-L. In conclusion, the LAT1 isoform is the major transporter of tyrosine in human fibroblast cells. Competition between tyrosine and alanine for transport is shown to exist, probably between LAT1 and LAT2 isoforms. This study established fibroblast cells as a suitable experimental model for studying amino acid transport defects in humans. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据