4.7 Review

Neural correlates of action: Comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 31-44

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003

关键词

Motor imagery; Action observation; Movement execution; Action simulation; Motor simulation; Mental imagery; Action observation system; Mirror neurons movement control; Motor control

资金

  1. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship NEURO-AGE [702784]
  2. Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [R01-MH074457]
  4. Helmholtz Portfolio Theme Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [7202070]
  6. KU Leuven Special Research Fund [C16/15/070]
  7. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G0708.14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several models propose Motor Imagery, Action Observation, and Movement Execution recruit the same brain regions. There is, however, no quantitative synthesis of the literature that directly compares their respective networks. Here we summarized data from neuroimaging experiments examining Motor Imagery (303 experiments, 4902 participants), Action Observation (595 experiments, 11,032 participants), and related control tasks involving Movement Execution (142 experiments, 2302 participants). Comparisons across these networks showed that Motor Imagery and Action Observation recruited similar premotor-parietal cortical networks. However, while Motor Imagery recruited a similar subcortical network to Movement Execution, Action Observation did not consistently recruit any subcortical areas. These data quantify and amend previous models of the similarities in the networks for Motor Imagery, Action Observation, and Movement Execution, while highlighting key differences in their recruitment of motor cortex, parietal cortex, and subcortical structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据