4.7 Review

Interactions between brain structure and behavior: The corpus callosum and bimanual coordination

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 1-19

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.008

关键词

Corpus callosum; Partitioning schemes; Bimanual coordination; Mediating factors (age, pathology, training); Split-brain patients; Diffusion tensor imaging; Coordination constraints

资金

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - FWO) [G.0482.010, G0483.10, G.A114.11, G0721.12]
  2. KU Leuven, Belgium [OT/11/071]
  3. Interuniversity Attraction Poles program of the Belgian Federal Government [P7/11]
  4. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bimanual coordination skills are required for countless everyday activities, such as typing, preparing food, and driving. The corpus callosum (CC) is the major collection of white matter bundles connecting both hemispheres that enables the coordination between the two sides of the body. Principal evidence for this brain-behavior relationship in humans was first provided by research on callosotomy patients, showing that sectioning (parts of) the CC affected interactions between both hands directly. Later, new noninvasive in vivo imaging techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, have energized the study of the link between microstructural properties of the CC and bimanual performance in normal volunteers. Here we discuss the principal factors (such as age, pathology and training) that mediate the relationship between specific bimanual functions and distinct anatomical CC subdivisions. More specifically, the question is whether different bimanual task characteristics can be mapped onto functionally distinct CC subregions. We review the current status of this mapping endeavor, and propose future perspectives to inspire research on this unique link between brain structure and behavior. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据