4.7 Review

Mitochondrial dysfunction as a central actor in intellectual disability-related diseases: An overview of Down syndrome, autism, Fragile X and Rett syndrome

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 202-217

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.012

关键词

Intellectual disability; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial dysfunction; Oxidative phosphorylation; Neurogenesis; Neuroplasticity; Down syndrome; Rett syndrome; Autism; Fragile X; Oxidative stress; Drug development; Epigallocatechine-3-gallate

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Instruction
  2. University and Research (MIUR)-Programma FIRB-MERIT [1-RBNE08HWLZ-012]
  3. Fondation Jerome Lejeune [VACCA/1093-VR2012B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical manifestations typical of mitochondrial diseases are often present in various genetic syndromes associated with intellectual disability, a condition leading to deficit in cognitive functions and adaptive behaviors. Until now, the causative mechanism leading to intellectual disability is unknown and the progression of the condition is poorly understood. We first report latest advances on genetic and environmental regulation of mitochondrial function and its role in brain development. Starting from the structure, function and regulation of the oxidative phosphorylation apparatus, we review how mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics play a central role in neurogenesis and neuroplasticity. We then discuss how dysfunctional mitochondria and alterations in reactive oxygen species homeostasis are potentially involved in the pathogenesis of various neurodevelopmental syndromes with a special focus on Down, Rett, Fragile X syndromes and autism spectrum disorders. Finally, we review and suggest novel therapeutic approaches aimed at improving intellectual disability by activating mitochondrial function and reducing oxidative stress to amiliorate the quality of life in the subjects affected. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据