4.7 Review

The contribution of brain sub-cortical loops in the expression and acquisition of action understanding abilities

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 37, 期 10, 页码 2504-2515

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.016

关键词

Psychology; Neuroscience; Mirror neurons; Action understanding; Sub-cortical processes; Cerebellar cortical loops; Basal ganglia cortical loops; Forward models; Inverse models

资金

  1. EU [FP7-IP -231722, FP7-ICT-270108]
  2. Wellcome Trust [WT087554]
  3. MRC [MR/K00414X/1, MR/J012610/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/J012610/1, MR/K00414X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on action understanding in cognitive neuroscience has led to the identification of a wide action understanding network mainly encompassing parietal and premotor cortical areas. Within this cortical network mirror neurons are critically involved implementing a neural mechanism according to which, during action understanding, observed actions are reflected in the motor patterns for the same actions of the observer. We suggest that focusing only on cortical areas and processes could be too restrictive to explain important facets of action understanding regarding, for example, the influence of the observer's motor experience, the multiple levels at which an observed action can be understood, and the acquisition of action understanding ability. In this respect, we propose that aside from the cortical action understanding network, sub-cortical processes pivoting on cerebellar and basal ganglia cortical loops could crucially support both the expression and the acquisition of action understanding abilities. Within the paper we will discuss how this extended view can overcome some limitations of the pure cortical perspective, supporting new theoretical predictions on the brain mechanisms underlying action understanding that could be tested by future empirical investigations. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据