4.7 Review

Self-reflection and the brain: A theoretical review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies with implications for schizophrenia

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 935-946

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.004

关键词

Self-reflection; Self-appraisal; Other-reflection; Cortical Midline Structures; Dorsomedial PFC; Ventromedial PFC; Schizophrenia; Insight

资金

  1. European Science Foundation EURYI [044035001]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health
  3. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  4. Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
  5. Medical Research Council [G90/96] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [G90/96] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several studies have investigated the neural correlates of self-reflection. In the paradigm most commonly used to address this concept, a subject is presented with trait adjectives or sentences and asked whether they describe him or her. Functional neuroimaging research has revealed a set of regions known as Cortical Midline Structures (CMS) appearing to be critically involved in self-reflection processes. Furthermore, it has been shown that patients suffering damage to the CMS, have difficulties in properly evaluating the problems they encounter and often overestimate their capacities and performance. Building on previous work, a meta-analysis of published fMRI and PET studies on self-reflection was conducted. The results showed that two areas within the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) are important in reflective processing, namely the ventral (v) and dorsal (d) MPFC. In this paper a model is proposed in which the vMPFC is responsible for tagging information relevant for 'self, whereas the dMPFC is responsible for evaluation and decision-making processes in self- and other-referential processing. Finally, implications of the model for schizophrenia and lack of insight are noted. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据