4.7 Review

Evidence for a cytokine model of cognitive function

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 355-366

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.005

关键词

Cytokines; Cognition; CNS; TNF; IL-6; IL-1beta; IFN gamma; Alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aiming at a formulation of a cytokine model of cognitive function under immunologically unchallenged physiological conditions, this article reviews the cytokine biology in the central nervous system (CNS) and recent developments in normal cytokine functions within the CNS that subserve cognitive processes. Currently available evidence shows that the cytokines IL-1 beta, IL-6 and TNF-alpha play a role in complex cognitive processes at the molecular level, such as synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis. as well as neuromodulation. Such findings provide evidence for a cytokine model of cognitive function, which shows that cytokines play an intimate role in the molecular and cellular mechanisms subserving learning, memory and cognition under physiological conditions. These cytokine-mediated cognitive processes have implications in the long-term development and pathogenesis of specific neuropsychiatric disorders such as major depression and dementia. The identification of this central role of cytokines in various brain activities during health provides greater insight into normal brain functions, especially synaptic plasticity, memory and cognition, and facilitates the understanding of specific biological mechanisms involved in neuropsychiatric diseases, such as dementia and depression. In order to extend the suggested cytokine model of cognitive function onto other members of the cytokine family, future research is required to investigate the physiological effects of other cytokines such as interferon-gamma (IFN gamma), alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin and IL-2 on cognitive function at the molecular level under immunologically unchallenged conditions. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据