4.5 Article

SEROTONERGIC NERVE FIBERS IN L-DOPA-DERIVED DOPAMINE RELEASE AND DYSKINESIA

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 73-86

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.029

关键词

L-DOPA; dyskinesia; 5-HT; in vivo chronoamperometry; fluoxetine; WAY-100 635.

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [09917]
  2. Umea University Medical Faculty Funds
  3. Konung Gustav V och drottning Victoria's Fond
  4. Parkinsonfonden, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 5-HT (5-hydroxytryptamine) system has been assigned a key role in the development of 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl- L-alanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia, mainly due to 5-HT neuronal ability to decarboxylate L-DOPA into dopamine. Nevertheless, knowledge of L-DOPA-induced events that could lead to development of dyskinesias are limited and therefore the present work has evaluated (i) the role of the 5-HT system in L-DOPA-derived dopamine synthesis when dopamine neurons are present, (ii) L-DOPA-induced effects on striatal dopamine release and clearance, and on 5-HT nerve fiber density, and (iii) the behavioral outcome of altered 5-HT transmission in dyskinetic rats. Chronoamperometric recordings demonstrated attenuated striatal L-DOPA-derived dopamine release (similar to 30%) upon removal of 5-HT nerve fibers in intact animals. Interestingly, four weeks of daily L-DOPA treatment yielded similar-sized dopamine peak amplitudes in intact animals as found after a 5-HTlesion. Moreover, chronic L-DOPA exposure attenuated striatal 5-HT nerve fiber density in the absence of dopamine nerve terminals. Furthermore, fluoxetine-induced altered 5-HT transmission blocked dyskinetic behavior via action on 5-HT1A receptors. Taken together, the results indicate a central role for the 5-HT system in L-DOPA-derived dopamine synthesis and in dyskinesia, and therefore potential L-DOPA-induced deterioration of 5-HT function might reduce L-DOPA efficacy as well as promote the upcoming of motor side effects. (C) 2013 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据