4.5 Article

INVOLVEMENT OF THE AKT/GSK-3β/CRMP-2 PATHWAY IN AXONAL INJURY AFTER HYPDXIC-ISCHEMIC BRAIN DAMAGE IN NEONATAL RAT

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 123-132

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.052

关键词

axon; brain; hypoxia-ischemia; injury; neonatal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30825039, 30973236, 31171020, 81172174]
  2. Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [IRT0935, 20110181130002]
  3. Sichuan Science and Technology Development Funds [2010SZ0280]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Akt has been demonstrated as a survival kinase in brain after hypoxia-ischemia (HI). Previous studies have shown that glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3 beta)/collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP-2) signaling pathway could be regulated by Akt for axonal-dendritic polarity. CRMP-2 is associated also with microtubule-mediated trafficking. However, whether Akt could regulate GSK-3 beta/CRMP-2 pathway and the possible effects of this regulation is unclear in developing brain after HI. In this study, we detected the expression of total and phosphorylated Akt, GSK-3 beta, and CRMP-2, as well as the axonal injury marker amyloid precursor protein (APP) by utilizing an HI model in postnatal 10-day rats. Axonal loss was determined by Bielschowsky silver impregnation, and histological injury was evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. We found that the phosphorylation of Akt was accompanied by phosphorylation of GSK-3 beta and dephosphorylation of CRMP-2 after HI. Furthermore, Akt inhibition significantly decreased the phosphorylation of GSK-3 beta and dephosphorylation of CRMP-2. Moreover, the down-regulation of dephosphorylated CRMP-2 was associated with increased axonal injury (increased APP expression and axonal loss). Our findings suggest that the Akt/GSK-3 beta/CRMP-2 pathway mediates axonal injury in neonatal rat brain after HI. (C) 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据