4.5 Article

THE REPETITION TIMING OF HIGH FREQUENCY AFFERENT STIMULATION DRIVES THE BIDIRECTIONAL PLASTICITY AT CENTRAL SYNAPSES IN THE RAT MEDIAL VESTIBULAR NUCLEI

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.039

关键词

high frequency stimulation; bidirectional synaptic plasticity; medial vestibular nuclei; LTP; LTD

资金

  1. COMPAGNIA di San Paolo (Torino): Progetti Programma Neuroscienze [2008.2176]
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia [2009.020.0036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we show that high frequency stimulation (HFS, 100 Hz) of afferent fibers to the medial vestibular nucleus (MVN) can induce opposite long-term modifications of synaptic responses in the type B neurons depending upon the stimulation pattern. Long burst stimulation (LBS: 2 s) and short burst stimulation (SBS: 0.55 s) were applied with different burst number (BN) and inter-burst intervals (181). It results that both LBS and SBS can induce either N-methyl-D aspartate receptors (NMDARs)-mediated long-term potentiation (LIP) or long-term depression (LTD), depending on temporal organization of repetitive bursts. In particular, the IBI plays a relevant role in guiding the shift from LTP to LTD since by using both LBS and SBS LTP is induced by shorter IBI than LTD. By contrast, the sign of long-term effect does not depend on the mean impulse frequency evaluated within the entire stimulation period. Therefore, the patterns of repetitive vestibular activation with different ratios between periods of increased activity and periods of basal activity may lead to LTP or LTD probably causing different levels of postsynaptic Ca2+. On the whole, this study demonstrates that glutamatergic vestibular synapse in the MVN can undergo NMDAR-dependent bidirectional plasticity and puts forward a new aspect for understanding the adaptive and compensatory plasticity of the oculomotor responses. (c) 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据