4.5 Article

TRANSGENE EXPRESSION IN THE STRIATUM FOLLOWING INTRACEREBRAL INJECTIONS OF DNA NANOPARTICLES ENCODING FOR HUMAN GLIAL CELL LINE-DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 220-226

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.07.072

关键词

plasmid optimization; Parkinson's disease; gene therapy; splice variant

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS50311, NS75871]
  2. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  3. Jelm Foundation
  4. State of Ohio Biomedical Research Commercialization Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A goal of our studies is to develop a potential therapeutic for Parkinson's disease (PD) by a human glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (hGDNF) expression plasmid administered to the rat striatum as a compacted DNA nano-particle (DNP) and which will generate long-term hGDNF expression at biologically active levels. In the present study, we used a DNA plasmid encoding for hGDNF and a polyubiquitin C (UbC) promoter that was previously shown to have activity in both neurons and glia, but primarily in glia. A two-fold improvement was observed at the highest plasmid dose when using hGDNF DNA incorporating sequences found in RNA splice variant 1 compared with splice variant 2; of note, the splice variant 2 sequence is used in most preclinical studies. This optimized expression cassette design includes flanking scaffold matrix attachment elements (S/MARs) as well as a CpG-depleted prokaryotic domain and, where possible, eukaryotic elements. Stable long-term GDNF activity at levels 300-400% higher than baseline was observed following a single intracerebral injection. In a previous study, DNP plasmids encoding for reporter genes had been successful in generating long-term reporter transgene activity in the striatum (>365 days) and in this study produced sustained GDNF activity at the longest assessed time point (6 months). (C) 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据