4.5 Article

ELEVATED RESPONSE OF HUMAN AMYGDALA TO NEUTRAL STIMULI IN MILD POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER: NEURAL CORRELATES OF GENERALIZED EMOTIONAL RESPONSE

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 168, 期 3, 页码 670-679

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.024

关键词

amygdala; emotion; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies has shown that amygdala responses to emotionally neutral pictures are exaggerated at a group level in patients with severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [Hendler T, Rotshtein P, Yeshurun Y, Weizmann T, Kahn I, Ben-Bashat D, Malach R, Bleich A (2003) Neuroimage 19(3):587-600]. The present fMRI study tested the hypothesis that amygdala responses are elevated not only in response to negative pictures but also to neutral pictures as a function of disease severity in patients with mild symptoms and in subjects who did not develop symptoms. To this end, fMRI scans were performed in 10 patients with mild PTSD and 10 healthy controls (both victims of a bank robbery), during the execution of a visuo-attentional task in which they were asked to observe emotionally negative or neutral pictures. Control subjects showed enhanced amygdala responses to emotionally negative stimuli compared to neutral stimuli. On the contrary, PTSD patients were characterized by high amygdala responses to both neutral and emotional pictures, with no statistically significant difference between the two classes of stimuli. In the entire group, we found correlations among the severity of the PTSD symptoms, task performance, and amygdala activation during the processing of neutral stimuli. Results of this study suggest that amygdala responses and the selectivity of the emotional response to neutral stimuli are elevated as a function of disease severity in PTSD patients with mild symptoms. (C) 2010 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据