4.5 Article

ROLE OF PERIPHERAL AND SPINAL 5-HT6 RECEPTORS ACCORDING TO THE RAT FORMALIN TEST

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 162, 期 2, 页码 444-452

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.072

关键词

5-HT6 receptors; SB-399885; SB-258585; hyperalgesia; peripheral sensitization; spinal processing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study assessed the possible pronociceptive role of peripheral and spinal 5-HT6 receptors in the formalin test For this, local peripheral administration of selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonists N-[3,5-dichloro-2-(methoxy)phenyl], 4-(methoxy)-3-(1-piperazinyl)-benzenesulphonamide (SB-399885) (0.01-1 nmol/paw) and 4-iodo-N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)phenyl]benzene-sulfonamide hydrochloride (SB-258585) (0.001-0.1 nmol/paw) significantly reduced formalin-induced flinching. Local peripheral serotonin (5-HT) (10-100 nmol/paw) or 5-chloro-2-methyl-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydro4-pyridinyl)-1H-indole hydrochloride (EMD-386088) (0.01-0.1 nmol/paw; a selective 5-HT6 receptor agonist) augmented 0.5% formalin-induced nociceptive behavior. The local pronociceptive effect of 5-HT (100 nmol/paw) or EMD-386088 (0.1 nmol/paw) was significantly reduced by SB-399885 or SB-258585 (0.1 nmol/paw). In contrast to peripheral administration, intrathecal injection of 5-HT, receptor antagonists SB-399885 and SB-258585 (0.1-10 nmol/rat) did not modify 1% formal in-induced nociceptive behavior. Spinal 5-HT (50-200 nmol/rat) significantly reduced formalin-induced flinching behavior during phases 1 and 2. Contrariwise, intrathecal EMD-386088 (0.1-10 nmol/rat) dose-dependently increased flinching during phase 2. The spinal pronociceptive effect of EMD-386088 (1 nmol/rat) was reduced by SB-399885 (1 nmol/rat) and SB-258585 (0.1 nmol/rat). Our results suggest that 5-HT6 receptors play a pronociceptive role in peripheral as well as spinal sites in the rat formalin test. Thus, 5-HT, receptors could be a target to develop analgesic drugs. (C) 2009 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据