4.5 Article

ENDOGENOUS HYDROGEN SULFIDE IS INVOLVED IN REGULATION OF RESPIRATION IN MEDULLARY SLICE OF NEONATAL RATS

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 156, 期 4, 页码 1074-1082

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.025

关键词

respiratory regulation; medullary slices; discharge of hypoglossal rootlets; K-ATP channel; cAMP

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30370530, 30770798]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of the present study was to verify our assumption that rhythmic respiratory activity may be regulated by endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in the medullary slices of neonatal rats. We found that a moderate concentration of donor of H2S, NaHS, mainly induced diphasic respiratory responses indicated by changes of discharge frequency (DF) of hypoglossal rootlets, an initial inhibitory stage followed by a later excitatory one. Cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) substrate, cysteine (CYS), exerted similar effects. CBS inhibitor, NH2OH, could eliminate both inhibitory and excitatory effects in the two stages induced by CYS. K-ATP channel blocker, glibenclamide (Gl), could eliminate the decrease in DF in the initial stage, but not the increase in the later one. On the other hand, adenyl cyclase (AC) inhibitor, SQ-22536 (SQ) could eliminate the increase in DF in the later stage, but not the decrease in the initial one, of the rootlets caused by NaHS. Co-application of GI and SQ eliminated both inhibitory and excitatory effect induced by NaHS. The cAMP level was increased in the later stage but not in the initial one by NaHS, and the increase in the cAMP level could be eliminated by SQ. It can be concluded that the endogenous H2S could be produced through the CBS-H2S pathway and could be involved in the control of the central rhythmic respiration in the in vitro medullary slices of neonatal rats by opening KATP channels and activating AC-cAMP pathway of the neurons. (C) 2008 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据