4.3 Article

MiR-16 attenuates -amyloid-induced neurotoxicity through targeting -site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 in an Alzheimer's disease cell model

期刊

NEUROREPORT
卷 29, 期 16, 页码 1365-1372

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001118

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; -amyloid; miR-16; -site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81371260]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2013010015600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aberrant deposition of -amyloid (A) is closely linked to the pathogenesis and development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). MiR-16 was abnormally downregulated and may be related to the development of AD. However, the functional role and molecular mechanism of miR-16 in AD pathogenesis are still not well elucidated. The expressions of miR-16 and -site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) mRNA and protein levels in AD brain tissues and A-treated PC12 cellular AD model were examined by qRT-PCR and western blot analyses. Luciferase reporter assay was used to verify the potential target of miR-16. The cell viability, apoptosis, and caspase-3 activity in PC12 cells were determined by the MTT assay, flow cytometry analysis, and caspase-3 activity assay, respectively. Downregulation of miR-16 and upregulation of BACE1 existed in AD tissues and the cellular AD model of PC12. In addition, miR-16 directly suppressed BACE1 expression. Moreover, miR-16 overexpression and BACE1 knockdown facilitated A-induced cell toxicity, apoptosis, and caspase-3 activity in N2a cells, which was partially eliminated by overexpression of BACE1. In contrast, BACE1 knockdown reversed the miR-16 inhibition-mediated inhibitory effect on A-induced cell toxicity, apoptosis, and caspase-3 activity in PC12 cells. Collectively, miR-16 attenuated A-induced neurotoxicity through targeting BACE1 in an A insult cellular AD model, providing a potential therapeutic target for AD treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据