4.7 Article

Oxytocin Reduces Background Anxiety in a Fear-Potentiated Startle Paradigm: Peripheral vs Central Administration

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 2488-2497

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2011.138

关键词

oxytocin; anxiety; fear; startle; PTSD

资金

  1. U.S. Army Medical Research & Materiel Command [W81XWH-08-1-0182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxytocin is known to have anti-anxiety and anti-stress effects. Using a fear-potentiated startle paradigm in rats, we previously demonstrated that subcutaneously administered oxytocin suppressed acoustic startle following fear conditioning compared with startle before fear conditioning (termed background anxiety), but did not have an effect on cue-specific fear-potentiated startle. The findings suggest oxytocin reduces background anxiety, an anxious state not directly related to cue-specific fear, but sustained beyond the immediate threat. The goal of the present study was to compare the effects of centrally and peripherally administered oxytocin on background anxiety and cue-specific fear. Male rats were given oxytocin either subcutaneously (SC) or intracerebroventricularly (ICV) into the lateral ventricles before fear-potentiated startle testing. Oxytocin doses of 0.01 and 0.1 mu g/kg SC reduced background anxiety. ICV administration of oxytocin at doses from 0,002 to 20 mu g oxytocin had no effect on background anxiety or cue-specific fear-potentiated startle. The 20 mu g ICV dose of oxytocin did reduce acoustic startle in non-fear conditioned rats. These studies indicate that oxytocin is potent and effective in reducing background anxiety when delivered peripherally, but not when delivered into the cerebroventricular system. Oxytocin given systemically may have anti-anxiety properties that are particularly germane to the hypervigilance and exaggerated startle typically seen in many anxiety and mental health disorder patients. Neuropsychopharmacology (2011) 36, 2488-2497; doi:10.1038/npp.2011.138; published online 27 July 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据