4.7 Review

Neuroanatomical and Neurochemical Substrates of Timing

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 3-25

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2010.113

关键词

putamen; dopamine; glutamate; Parkinson's Disease; temporal prediction; hazard function

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. ECRP-SS [06_ECRP_FP009]
  3. National Institutes of Mental Health [R01MH073057]
  4. James McKeen Cattell Fund
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH073057] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We all have a sense of time. Yet, there are no sensory receptors specifically dedicated for perceiving time. It is an almost uniquely intangible sensation: we cannot see time in the way that we see color, shape, or even location. So how is time represented in the brain? We explore the neural substrates of metrical representations of time such as duration estimation (explicit timing) or temporal expectation (implicit timing). Basal ganglia (BG), supplementary motor area, cerebellum, and prefrontal cortex have all been linked to the explicit estimation of duration. However, each region may have a functionally discrete role and will be differentially implicated depending upon task context. Among these, the dorsal striatum of the BG and, more specifically, its ascending nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway seems to be the most crucial of these regions, as shown by converging functional neuroimaging, neuropsychological, and psychopharmacological investigations in humans, as well as lesion and pharmacological studies in animals. Moreover, neuronal firing rates in both striatal and interconnected frontal areas vary as a function of duration, suggesting a neurophysiological mechanism for the representation of time in the brain, with the excitatory-inhibitory balance of interactions among distinct subtypes of striatal neuron serving to fine-tune temporal accuracy and precision. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews (2011) 36, 3-25; doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.113; published online 28 July 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据