4.7 Article

Alcohol Exposure Alters NMDAR Function in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 2420-2429

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2009.69

关键词

anxiety; withdrawal; plasticity; addiction; stress; postsynaptic

资金

  1. NIH [K99AA017668, U01AA015635, 5T32MH065215, RO1MH63232]
  2. UNCF-Merck Postdoctoral fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic alcohol exposure can cause dramatic behavioral alterations, including increased anxiety-like behavior and depression. These alterations are proposed to be due in part to adaptations in the brain regions that regulate emotional behavior, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), a principal output nucleus of the amygdala. However, to date there have been no studies that have examined the impact of in vivo alcohol exposure on synaptic function in the BNST. To better understand how alcohol can alter neuronal function, we examined the ability of in vivo alcohol exposure to alter glutamatergic transmission in the BNST using whole-cell voltage clamp recordings and biochemistry in brain slices obtained from C57Bl6 mice. Chronic intermittent, but not continuous, ethanol vapor exposure increased temporal summation of NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Both electrophysiological and biochemical approaches suggest that this difference is not because of an alteration in glutamate release, but rather an increase in the levels of NR2B-containing NMDARs. Further, we found that ethanol modulation of NMDAR in the vBNST is altered after intermittent alcohol exposure. Our results support the hypothesis that NMDAR-mediated synaptic transmission is sensitized at key synapses in the extended amygdala and thus may be a suitable target for manipulation of the behavioral deficits associated with acute withdrawal from chronic alcohol exposure. Neuropsychopharmacology (2009) 34, 2420-2429; doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.69; published online 24 June 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据