4.7 Article

Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors 5 Blockade Reverses Spatial Memory Deficits in a Mouse Model of Parkinson's Disease

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 729-738

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2008.129

关键词

visuo-spatial discrimination; Parkinson's disease; mGluR5 antagonist; mice; rotational behavior

资金

  1. Galileo
  2. MIUR
  3. ASI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Visuo-spatial deficits are the most consistently reported cognitive abnormalities in Parkinson's disease (PD), and they are frequently associated to motor symptoms in the early stages of the disease when dopamine loss is moderate and still restricted to the caudate putamen. The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) antagonist, 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), has beneficial effects on motor symptoms in animal models of PD. However, the effects of MPEP on the cognitive deficits of the disease have never been investigated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore its therapeutic potentials by investigating its effects on the visuo-spatial deficits induced by 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions of dorsal striatum in CD1 mice. The results demonstrated that systemic injections of MPEP (6, 12, and 24 mg/kg, i.p.) impair visuo-spatial discrimination in intact mice at high concentrations, whereas lower doses (1.5 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.) were void of effects. Nevertheless, when an ineffective dose (MPEP 3 mg/kg) was injected, either acutely or subchronically (8 days), it antagonized the visuo-spatial discrimination deficit induced by bilateral dopamine lesion of the striatum. Furthermore, the same treatment increased contralateral turning induced by L-DOPA in mice bearing unilateral 6-OHDA lesion. These results confirm the therapeutic potential of mGluR5 blockade on motor symptoms induced by reduced striatal dopamine function. Further, they demonstrate that mGluR5 blockade may also have beneficial effects on cognitive deficits induced by dopamine depletion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据