4.5 Article

Double dissociation of the roles of the left and right prefrontal cortices in anticipatory regulation of action

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 215-225

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.026

关键词

Proactive control; Prefrontal cortex; Hemispheric differences; Semantic interference effect; Gratton effect

资金

  1. Fyssen Foundation
  2. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health [F32DC013245]
  3. Clinical Sciences Research and Development Service of the Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development [101BX007080]
  4. Individual Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Sciences Research and Development Merit Awards
  5. NINDS [2R37NS21135]
  6. Nielsen Corporation
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R37NS021135] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [F32DC013245] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent actions can benefit or disrupt our current actions and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to play a major role in the regulation of these actions before they occur. The left PFC has been associated with overcoming interference from past events in the context of language production and working memory. The right PFC, and especially the right IFG, has been associated with preparatory inhibition processes. But damage to the right PFC has also been associated with impairment in sustaining actions in motor intentional disorders. Moreover, bilateral dorsolateral PFC has been associated with the ability to maintain task-sets, and improve the performance of current actions based on previous experience. However, potential hemispheric asymmetries in anticipatory regulation of action have not yet been delineated. In the present study, patients with left (n=7) vs. right (n=6) PFC damage due to stroke and 14 aged- and education-matched controls performed a picture naming and a verbal Simon task (participants had to say right or left depending on the color of the picture while ignoring its position). In both tasks, performance depended on the nature of the preceding trial, but in different ways. In the naming task, performance decreased if previous pictures were from the same rather than from different semantic categories (i.e., semantic interference effect). In the Simon task, performance was better for both compatible (i.e., response matching the position of the stimulus) and incompatible trials when preceded by a trial of the same compatibility (i.e. Gratton effect) relative to sequential trials of different compatibility. Left PFC patients were selectively impaired in picture naming; they had an increased semantic interference effect compared to both right PFC patients and aged-matched controls. Conversely, right PFC patients were selectively impaired in the Simon task compared to controls or left PFC patients; they showed no benefit when sequential trials were compatible (cC vs. iC trials) or a decreased Gratton effect. These results provide evidence for a double dissociation between left and right PFC in the anticipatory regulation of action. Our results are in agreement with a preponderant role of the left PFC in overcoming proactive interference from competing memory representations and provide evidence that the right PFC, plays a role in sustaining goal-directed actions consistent with clinical data in right PFC patients with motor intentional disorders. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据