4.5 Article

The relevance of the functional 5-HT1A receptor polymorphism for attention and working memory processes during mental rotation of characters

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 1248-1254

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.025

关键词

Mental rotation; Serotonin; Attention; Event-related potentials (ERPs); Imaging genetics

资金

  1. Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research of the University of Munster, Germany [IZKF FG4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous lines of research indicate that attentional processes, working memory and saccadic processes are highly interrelated. In the current study, we examine the relation between these processes with respect to their cognitive-neurophysiological and neurobiological background by means of event-related potentials (ERPs) in a sample of N=72 healthy probands characterized for the functional serotonin receptor 1 A (5-HT1A) C(-1019)G polymorphism. The results support a close interrelation between working memory, attentional and saccadic processes. Yet, these processes are differentially modulated by the 5-HT1A C(-1019)G polymorphism. The 5-HT1A C(-1019)G polymorphism primarily affects attentional processing, whereas processes related to the mental rotation of an object are independent of 5-HT1A genetic variation. It is shown that an increasing number of -1019 G alleles leads to a differential reduction of the N1 above the left and right hemisphere and hence bottom-up attentional processing. In the way increasing numbers of -1019 G alleles lead to a reduction of attentional processes, saccadic activity increases as a similar function of the number of -1019 G alleles. This increase in activity occurs parallel in time to the process of mental rotation. It is hypothesized that decreased attentional processes, dependent on different 5-HT1A C(-1019)G genotypes, may cause parietal networks to increase saccadic activity in order to perform mental rotation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据