4.5 Article

Compensatory mechanisms underlie intact task-switching performance in schizophrenia

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 1305-1323

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.034

关键词

Cognitive control; Schizophrenia; ERP; fMRI; Task-switching

资金

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award
  2. Schizophrenia Research Institute
  3. University of Newcastle Research Grants Committee
  4. Hunter Medical Research Institute
  5. Australian Schizophrenia Research Bank (ASRB)
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  7. Pratt Foundation
  8. Ramsay Health Care
  9. Viertel Charitable Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals with schizophrenia tend to perform poorly on many measures of cognitive control. However, recent task-switching studies suggest that they show intact task-switching performance, despite the fact that the regions involved in task-switching are known to be structurally and functionally impaired in the disorder. Behavioral, event-related potential (ERP) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures were used to compare the temporal and spatial dynamics of task-switching performance in individuals with schizophrenia and controls. Consistent with previous studies, reaction time (RT) switch cost and its reduction with anticipatory preparation did not differ between groups. There were also no group differences on cue-locked ERP components associated with anticipatory preparation processes. However, both stimulus- and response-locked ERPs were significantly disrupted in schizophrenia, suggesting difficulty with task-set implementation. fMRI analyses indicated that individuals with schizophrenia showed hyperactivity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex. RT-fMRI and ERP-fMRI associations suggested that individuals with schizophrenia employ compensatory mechanisms to overcome difficulties in task-set implementation and thereby achieve the same behavioral outcomes as controls. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据