4.5 Article

Perceptual organization and visual search processes during target detection task performance in schizophrenia, as revealed by fMRI

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 2886-2893

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.030

关键词

Perception; Cognition; Vision; Visual search; MARI; Schizophrenia

资金

  1. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Past studies of perceptual organization in schizophrenia have demonstrated impairments binding fragmented stimulus components into unified representations. ERP and fMRI data indicate that even under conditions of adequate behavioral task performance, significant and meaningful changes in cortical and subcortical activation are present. Here, we examined, using fMRI, activation differences on a visual task wherein feature grouping was a precursor to the formation of distinct groups in the service of target location and identification. Method: Fourteen schizophrenia patients and 16 healthy controls completed a target detection task with 2 conditions: one in which target-distractor grouping facilitates detection (the Isolated condition) and one in which it hinders detection (the Embedded condition). Stimuli were blocked by condition. Accuracy and RT data were obtained in addition to fMRI data. Results: Patients and controls did not differ significantly in accuracy or RI in either condition. Within this context, controls demonstrated greater recruitment of brain regions involved in visual-spatial processing, and the groups differed in activity in areas known to support visual search, visual analysis, decision making and response generation. Conclusion: These findings are consistent with past data indicating reduced processing of stimulus organization, and the subsequent use of inefficient visual search strategies, even under conditions when behavioral performance is at a high level and matches that of healthy controls. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据