4.5 Article

Is it logical to count on quantifiers? Dissociable neural networks underlying numerical and logical quantifiers

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 104-111

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.015

关键词

fMRI; Number; Semantic memory; Comprehension

资金

  1. NIH [NS44266, NS53488, AG15116, AG17586, NS54575]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS044266, T32NS054575, P50NS053488] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG015116, P01AG017586] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study examined the neural substrate of two classes of quantifiers: numerical quantifiers like at least three which require magnitude processing, and logical quantifiers like some which can be understood using a simple form of perceptual logic. We assessed these distinct classes of quantifiers with converging observations from two sources: functional imaging data from healthy adults, and behavioral and structural data from patients with corticobasal degeneration who have acalculia. Our findings are consistent with the claim that numerical quantifier comprehension depends on a lateral parietal-dorsolateral prefrontal network, but logical quantifier comprehension depends instead on a rostral medial prefrontal-posterior cingulate network. These observations emphasize the important contribution of abstract number knowledge to the meaning of numerical quantifiers in semantic memory and the potential role of a logic-based evaluation in the service of non-numerical quantifiers. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据