4.5 Article

The role of the basal ganglia in implicit contextual learning: A study of Parkinson's disease

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 1269-1273

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.008

关键词

Implicit contextual cueing; Spatial; Memory; Parkinson's disease; Basal ganglia

资金

  1. BIAL Foundation [73/06]
  2. FCT [POCI_SAU-NEU-60281_2004, SFRH/BPD/22088/2005]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/22088/2005, POCI/SAU-NEU/60281/2004] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Implicit contextual learning refers to the ability to memorize contextual information from our environment. This contextual information can then be used to guide our attention to a specific location. Although the medial temporal lobe is important for this type of learning, the basal ganglia might also be involved considering its role in many implicit learning processes. In order to understand the role of the basal ganglia in this top-down process, a group of non-demented early-stage Parkinson's patients were tested with a contextual cueing task. In this visual search task, subjects have to quickly locate a target among a number of distractors. To test implicit contextual learning, some of the configurations are repeated during the experiment, resulting in faster responses. A significant interaction effect was found between Group and Configuration, indicating that the control subjects responded faster when the spatial context was repeated, whereas Parkinson's patients failed to do so. These results, showing that the contextual cueing effect was significantly different for the patients than for the controls, suggest an important role for the basal ganglia in implicit contextual learning, thus extending previous findings of medial temporal lobe involvement. The basal ganglia are therefore not only involved in implicit motor learning, but may also have a role in purely visual implicit learning. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据