4.3 Article

Ventral Striatal Activation during Reward Processing in Subjects with Ultra-High Risk for Schizophrenia

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 50-56

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000337130

关键词

Nucleus accumbens; Reward expectation; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Prodrome; Schizophrenia

资金

  1. Charities AID Foundation
  2. European Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Early dysfunction of the brain reward system in schizophrenia might be already recognized in the prodromal phase of this illness. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the blood oxygen level-dependent response in the ventral striatum (VS) of subjects with ultra-high risk for psychosis during the presentation of reward-indicating and loss-indicating stimuli. Methods: Thirteen prodromal patients (mean age: 25.5 +/- 4.6 years) and 13 age-matched healthy volunteers participated in an incentive monetary delay task, in which visual cues predicted that a rapid response to a subsequent target stimulus will gain money, avoid losing money or have no consequence. Results: Compared with the neutral condition, anticipation of reward loss-avoidance elicited significant activation of the VS in both healthy subjects and subjects with ultra-high risk for psychosis, but there was only a statistical tendency for less activation during loss-avoidance anticipation in prodromal compared to healthy subjects. Discussion: This study provides a first weak hint, as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging, for impaired activation of a central area of the mesolimbic dopaminergic brain reward system, the VS, already in subjects with ultra-high risk for psychosis, which is in line with results of patients with full-blown schizophrenic psychosis. This pilot study has, however, strong limitations, and its results need to be replicated first before they can be used e. g. for early recognition of patients in the schizophrenic prodrome. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据