4.7 Review

Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders?

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 566-578

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.020

关键词

Noninvasive brain stimulation; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS, rTMS); Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Theta burst stimulation (TBS); Neuropsychiatry; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive; Depression; Schizophrenia; Alzheimer's disease; ADHD; Autism

资金

  1. Michael J Fox Foundation
  2. RJ Goldberg Foundation
  3. Berenson Foundation
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (Harvard Catalyst) [NCRR-NIH UL1 RR025758]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cognitive impairment is a core symptom of many neuropsychiatric diseases and a key contributor to the patient's quality of life. However, an effective therapeutic strategy has yet to be developed. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, namely transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are promising techniques that are under investigation for a variety of otherwise treatment-resistant neuropsychiatric diseases. Notably, these tools can induce alterations in neural networks subserving cognitive operations and thus may provide a means for cognitive restoration. The purpose of this article is to review the available evidence concerning cognitive enhancing properties of noninvasive brain stimulation in neuropsychiatry. We specifically focus on major depression. Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), where cognitive dysfunction is a major symptom and some studies have been completed with promising results. We provide a critical assessment of the available research and suggestions to guide future efforts. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Cognitive Enhancers'. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据