4.7 Article

Role of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 in the basolateral amygdala-driven prefrontal cortical deactivation in inflammatory pain in the rat

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 317-329

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.05.047

关键词

mGluRs; Prefrontal cortex; Basolateral amygdala; Inflammatory pain; Rat

资金

  1. MIUR-Italy (Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca) (Progetto di Ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plastic changes in the amygdala and limbic cortex networks have been widely shown in chronic pain. We have here investigated the role of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) pre-infra-limbic (PL-IL) divisions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) neuron connections after carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain in the rat. Intra-plantar injection of carrageenan decreased either spontaneous or mechanically/electrically evoked activity of PL cortex pyramidal neurons which responded with excitation in a way prevented by CPCOOEt, a selective mGluR1 antagonist, though not by MPEP, a selective mGluR5 antagonist. Accordingly, intra-BLA microinjection of DHPG, a group I mGluR agonist, caused PL cortex neuron activity depression, antagonized by CPCCOEt. CPCOOEt, but not MPEP, reduced also carrageenan-induced mechanical allodynia. The PL cortex cell deactivation in inflammatory pain condition was associated with increased GABA (conversely glutamate was decreased) in the PL/IL cortex. The local application of bicuculline, a GABA(A) receptor selective antagonist, reduced mechanical allodynia. An over-expression of mGluR1, but not mGluR5, have been observed in the PL-IL cortex after inflammatory pain suggesting an increased mGluR1-dependent crosstalk among BLA and IL-PL cortex neurons in inflammatory pain conditions. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors'. (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据