4.7 Article

Effects of risperidone and haloperidol on superoxide dismutase and nitric oxide in schizophrenia

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 62, 期 5-6, 页码 1928-1934

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.12.014

关键词

Schizophrenia; Free radical; Oxidative stress; Antipsychotic treatment

资金

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institute [03T-459, 05T-726]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [7072035]
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs, VISN 16, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC),United States National Institute of Health [K05-DA0454, P50-DA18827, U01-MH79639]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress may be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. No double-blind study has compared the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics on both antioxidant enzyme activity and nitric oxide (NO) levels in schizophrenic patients. Seventy-eight inpatients with chronic schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with 6 mg/day of risperidone or 20 mg/day of haloperidol using a double-blind design. Clinical efficacy was determined using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Blood superoxide dismutase (SOD) and plasma NO levels were measured in patients and 30 normal controls. Our results showed that following a 2-week washout period, levels of SOD and NO were significantly increased in patients with schizophrenia compared to normal controls. Both risperidone and haloperidol equivalently reduced the elevated blood SOD levels in schizophrenia, but neither medication reduced the elevated plasma NO levels in schizophrenia. Low blood SOD levels at baseline predicted greater symptom improvement during treatment, and greater change in SOD was correlated with greater symptom improvement. These results suggest that both typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs may at least partially normalize abnormal free radical metabolism in schizophrenia, and some free radical parameters at baseline may predict antipsychotic responses of schizophrenic patients. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据