4.7 Article

Allosteric modulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 affects phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization of the μ-opioid receptor

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 768-778

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.12.010

关键词

mu-Opioid receptor; Desensitization; Metabotropic glutamate receptor; HEK 293 cells; Receptor binding assay; GTP gamma S stimulation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SCH 405/2, 405/3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence suggests that opioid analgesia and tolerance can be modulated by metabotropic glutamate receptors. Therefore, we studied the functional coupling and desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells which co-express metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5). As demonstrated by the D-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4),Gl-ol(5)-enkephalin (DAMGO)-induced inhibition of intracellular cAMP level and by binding studies, the co-expression of mGIuR5 had no substantial effect on the agonist binding sites and functional coupling of the MOR. However, in MOR/mGIuR5 co-expressing cells, the non-competitive mGluR5 antagonist MPEP (2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine) decreases the DAMGO-induced MOR phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization, whereas non-selective competitive mGluR antagonists or agonists had no effects. These findings indicate that an allosteric modulation of mGIuR5 can affect the agonist-induced MOR signalling and regulation. As a mechanistic basis for the observed effects we suggested an interaction/hetero-dimerization of MOR and mGluR5, which is supported by the DAMGO-induced co-internalization of MOR and mGIuR5 and by the increase of MPEP binding sites (B-max) and a change of the binding affinity (K-D) Of mGIuR5 receptors after the co-expression of MOR. In addition, co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed evidence for an interaction between MOR and mGIuR5 which is facilitated by MPEP treatment. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据