4.5 Article

Quantification of dystrophin immunofluorescence in dystrophinopathy muscle specimens

期刊

NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 591-601

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2012.01250.x

关键词

Becker muscular dystrophy; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; dystrophin; image analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

L. E. Taylor, Y. J. Kaminoh, C. K. Rodesch and K. M. Flanigan (2012) Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology38, 591601 Quantification of dystrophin immunofluorescence in dystrophinopathy muscle specimens Aims: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is usually associated with absent or nearly absent dystrophin expression at the sarcolemmal membrane. Quantification of very low levels of dystrophin signal in immunofluorescent studies of muscle biopsy sections presents a technical challenge. This is particularly true in the setting of proof-of-principle drug trials, in which the detection and quantification of what may be significant changes in levels of expression is important, even if absolute dystrophin levels remain low. Methods: We have developed a method of image analysis that allows reliable and semi-automated immunofluorescent quantification of low-level dystrophin expression in sections co-stained for spectrin. Using a custom Metamorph script to create a contiguous region spectrin mask, we quantify dystrophin signal intensity only at pixels within the spectrin mask that presumably represent the sarcolemmal membrane. Using this method, we analysed muscle biopsy tissue from a series of patients with DMD, Becker muscular dystrophy, intermediate muscular dystrophy and normal control tissue. Results: Analysis of serial sections on multiple days confirms reproducibility, and normalized dystrophin : spectrin intensity ratios (expressed as a percentage of normal control tissue) correlate well with the dystrophin expression levels as determined by Western blot analysis. Conclusion: This method offers a robust and reliable method of biomarker detection for trials of DMD therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据