4.2 Article

Immunohistochemical evaluation of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression in 117 cases of glioblastoma

期刊

NEUROPATHOLOGY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 268-276

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/neup.12091

关键词

glioblastoma; immunohistochemistry; MGMT; survival analysis; temozolomide

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24590406] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent which is widely used in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) and is composed of astrocytic and/or oligodendroglial tumors, and the evaluation of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression is important to predict the response to TMZ therapy. In this study, we conducted immunohistochemical analysis of 117 cases of Japanese GBM including 19 cases of GBM with oligodendroglioma component (GBMO), using a scoring system for quantitative evaluation of staining intensity and proportion of MGMT, and performed survival analysis of these patients. Immunohistochemically, 55 cases (47%) were positive for MGMT with various intensities and proportions (total score (TS)2), while 62 cases (53%) were negative (TS=0). The distribution of MGMT expression pattern was not affected by any clinicopathological parameters such as the histological subtype (GBM vs. GBMO), age and gender. The survival analysis of these patients revealed that the minimal expression of MGMT (TS2) was a significant unfavorable prognostic factor (P<0.001) as well as resectability (P=0.004). Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that minimal MGMT expression in GBM was the most potent independent predictor for progression free survival (P<0.001) and also overall patient survival (P<0.001). This is the first report employing the scoring system for both staining intensity and proportion to evaluate immunohistochemical MGMT expression in GBM. In addition, our results emphases the clinicopathological values of the immunohistochemical approach for MGMT expression in glioma patients as a routine laboratory examination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据