4.8 Article

Anti-Aβ Therapeutics in Alzheimer's Disease: The Need for a Paradigm Shift

期刊

NEURON
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 203-213

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG05142]
  2. University of Southern California Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
  3. Myriad Genetics
  4. Lundbeck Inc.
  5. Elan Pharmaceuticals
  6. Sonexa Therapeutics
  7. Kareus Therapeutics
  8. Alzheimer's Association
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
  10. Baxter International Inc.
  11. Johnson Johnson Inc.
  12. Eli Lilly and Company
  13. Myriad Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  14. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  15. Pfizer Incorporated
  16. Wyeth
  17. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.
  18. Abbott Laboratories
  19. AC Immune
  20. GlaxoSmithKline
  21. Ipsen Group
  22. H. Lundbeck A/S
  23. Merck Co Inc.
  24. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.
  25. Sanofi-aventis LLC
  26. Servier Laboratories
  27. Schwabe Pharmaceuticals
  28. Toyama Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
  29. Transition Therapeutics Inc.
  30. [AG020206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most current Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapies in advanced phases of development target amyloid beta-peptide (A beta) production, aggregation, or accumulation. Translational models suggest that anti-A beta therapies may be highly effective if tested as agents to prevent or delay development of the disease or as therapies for asymptomatic patients with very early signs of AD pathology. However, anti-A beta therapeutics are currently being tested in symptomatic patients where they are likely to be much less effective or ineffective. The lack of alignment between human clinical studies and preclinical studies, together with predictions about optimal trial design based on our understanding of the initiating role of A beta aggregates in AD, has created a treatment versus prevention dilemma. In this perspective, we discuss why it is imperative to resolve this dilemma and suggest ways for moving forward in the hopes of enhancing the development of truly effective AD therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据