4.8 Article

Multisensory Mechanisms in Temporo-Parietal Cortex Support Self-Location and First-Person Perspective

期刊

NEURON
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 363-374

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stoicescu Foundation
  2. Swiss Science Foundation
  3. Centre d'Imagerie BioMedicale (CIBM) of the University of Lausanne (UNIL)
  4. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
  5. University of Geneva (UniGe)
  6. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
  7. Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve (HUG)
  8. Leenaards Foundation
  9. Jeantet Foundation
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [323530-123718]
  11. Swiss National Foundation [SINERGIA CRSII1-125135/1]
  12. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [323530-123718] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-consciousness has mostly been approached by philosophical enquiry and not by empirical neuroscientific study, leading to an overabundance of diverging theories and an absence of data-driven theories. Using robotic technology, we achieved specific bodily conflicts and induced predictable changes in a fundamental aspect of self-consciousness by altering where healthy subjects experienced themselves to be (self-location). Functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed that temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) activity reflected experimental changes in self-location that also depended on the first-person perspective due to visuo-tactile and visuo-vestibular conflicts. Moreover, in a large lesion analysis study of neurological patients with a well-defined state of abnormal self-location, brain damage was also localized at TPJ, providing causal evidence that TPJ encodes self-location. Our findings reveal that multisensory integration at the TPJ reflects one of the most fundamental subjective feelings of humans: the feeling of being an entity localized at a position in space and perceiving the world from this position and perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据