4.2 Article

IGHMBP2 mutation associated with organ-specific autonomic dysfunction

期刊

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 1012-1015

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2018.08.010

关键词

CMT; IGHMBP2 gene; Target multigene panel; Next generation sequencing; SMARD1

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [110043/Z/15/Z]
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC), MRC Centre grant [G0601943]
  3. National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke [U54NS065712]
  4. NCATS Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) [U54NS065712]
  5. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  6. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  7. office of Rare Diseases [U54NS065712]
  8. Wellcome Trust [110043/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  9. MRC [G0601943] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biallelic mutations in the IGHMBP2 have been associated with two distinct phenotypes: spinal muscular atrophy with respiratory distress type 1 (SMARDI) and CMT2S. We describe a patient who developed progressive muscle weakness and wasting in her upper and lower limbs from infancy. She developed respiratory involvement at age 9, eventually requiring 24-h non-invasive ventilation, and severe autonomic dysfunction restricted to the gastrointestinal tract. Neurophysiological studies at age 27 years revealed absent sensory and motor responses and severe chronic denervation changes in proximal muscles of the upper limbs. Targeted multigene panel sequencing detected a novel homozygous missense variant in the IGHMBP2 gene (c.1325A > G; p.Tyr442Cys). This variant was validated by Sanger sequencing and co-segregation analysis confirmed that both parents were asymptomatic heterozygous carriers. This case report confirms that IGHMBP2 related disorders can result in a severe peripheral neuropathy with gastrointestinal autonomic dysfunction requiring parenteral nutrition. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据