4.2 Article

Comparative analysis of antisense oligonucleotide sequences targeting exon 53 of the human DMD gene: Implications for future clinical trials

期刊

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 102-110

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2009.10.013

关键词

Exon skipping; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Antisense oligonucleotides; Phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer

资金

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Campaign, Action Duchenne (formerly Parent Project UK)
  2. Duchenne Family Support Group
  3. Muscular Dystrophy Ireland
  4. NIH
  5. Muscular Dystrophy Association USA
  6. Clinigene EC Network of Excellence [LSHB-CT-2006018933]
  7. Department of Health (UK)
  8. MRC
  9. Wellcome Trust University Award
  10. Muscular Dystrophy Campaign
  11. Association Francais Contre les Myopathies
  12. EU MYOAMP
  13. Duchenne Parent Project
  14. MRC [G0502130, G0601943] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Medical Research Council [G0502130, G0601943] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is caused by the lack of functional dystrophin protein, most commonly as a result of a range of out-of-frame mutations in the DMD gene. Modulation of pre-mRNA splicing with antisense oligonucleotides (AOs) to restore the reading frame has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, such that truncated but functional dystrophin is expressed. AO-induced skipping of exon 51 of the DMD gene, which could treat 13% of DMD patients, has now progressed to clinical trials. We describe here the methodical, cooperative comparison, in vitro (in DMD cells) and in vivo (in a transgenic mouse expressing human dystrophin), of 24 AOs of the phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMO) chemistry designed to target exon 53 of the DMD gene, skipping of which could be potentially applicable to 8% of patients. A number of the PMOs tested should be considered worthy of development for clinical trial. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据