4.7 Article

Cortical thickness mediates the effect of β-amyloid on episodic memory

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 82, 期 9, 页码 761-767

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000170

关键词

-

资金

  1. CIHR Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG012435, P50 AG005142, R01 AG042292, P30 AG010129, P30 AG10129, P01 AG12435] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This brain imaging study examines whether cognitively normal (NL) individuals with 2 parents affected by late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD) show evidence of more extensive Alzheimer disease pathology compared with those who have a single parent affected by LOAD. Methods: Fifty-two NL individuals received MRI, C-11-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET, and F-18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET. These included 4 demographically balanced groups (n = 13/group, aged 32-72 years, 60% female, 30% APOE epsilon 4 carriers) of NL individuals with maternal (FHm), paternal (FHp), and maternal and paternal (FHmp) family history of LOAD, and with negative family history (FH-). Statistical parametric mapping, voxel-based morphometry, and z-score mapping were used to compare MRI gray matter volumes (GMVs), partial volume-corrected PiB retention, and FDG metabolism across FH groups and vs FH-. Results: NL FHmp showed more severe abnormalities in all 3 biomarkers vs the other groups regarding the number of regions affected and magnitude of impairment. PiB retention and hypometabolism were most pronounced in FHmp, intermediate in FHm, and lowest in FHp and FH-. GMV reductions were highest in FHmp and intermediate in FHm and FHp vs FH-. In all FH+ groups, amyloid-beta deposition exceeded GMV loss and hypometabolism exceeded GMV loss (p < 0.001), while amyloid-beta deposition exceeded hypometabolism in FHmp and FHp but not in FHm. Conclusions: These biomarker findings show a LOAD parent-dose effect in NL individuals several years, if not decades, before possible clinical symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据