4.7 Article

Microvascular brain pathology and late-life motor impairment

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 80, 期 8, 页码 712-718

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182825116

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01AG17917, P30AG10161, AG31553, R01AG24480, HL096944, AG040039]
  2. Illinois Department of Public Health
  3. Borwell Endowment Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To test the hypothesis that microvascular brain pathology is associated with late-life motor impairment. Methods: More than 2,500 persons participating in the Religious Orders Study or the Memory and Aging Project agreed to annual motor assessment and autopsy. Brains from 850 deceased participants were assessed for microvascular pathology including microinfarcts, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and arteriolosclerosis, and we examined their association with global motor scores proximate to death. Results: Mean age at death was 88.5 years. More than 60% of cases had evidence of 1 or more microvascular pathologies and of these more than half did not have observed macroinfarcts. In separate regression models adjusted for age, sex, and education, microinfarcts and arteriolosclerosis were associated with level of motor function proximate to death (arteriolosclerosis, estimate, -0.027, SE 0.005, p < 0.001; microinfarcts, estimate, -0.017, SE 0.008, p = 0.026). These associations were not attenuated when controlling for vascular risk factors and diseases, postmortem interval, or interval from last clinical examination, and did not vary with level of cognition or presence of dementia proximate to death. When the 3 microvascular pathologies, macroinfarcts, and atherosclerosis were considered together in a single model, more severe arteriolosclerosis (estimate, -0.021, SE 0.005, p < 0.001) and macroinfarcts (estimate, -0.019, SE 0.006, p < 0.001) showed separate effects with the level of motor function proximate to death. Conclusions: Microvascular brain pathology is common in older adults and may represent an under-recognized, independent cause of late-life motor impairment. Neurology (R) 2013;80:712-718

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据