4.7 Article

Timed 25-Foot Walk Direct evidence that improving 20% or greater is clinically meaningful in MS

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 80, 期 16, 页码 1509-1517

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828cf7f3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Acorda Therapeutics Inc. [MS-F203, MS-F204]
  2. Biogen Idec Inc.
  3. Acorda Therapeutics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In this study, we used data from clinical trials of dalfampridine (fampridine outside the United States) to re-examine the clinical meaningfulness of Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) changes. Methods: Pooled data were analyzed from 2 phase III randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of dalfampridine in multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 533). Walking speed (T25FW) and patient-reported walking ability (MS Walking Scale-12 [MSWS-12]) were measured, concurrently, multiple times before and during treatment. We examined T25FW speed variability within and between visits, correlations of T25FW speed withMSWS-12 score, and changes in MSWS-12 (mean scores, effect sizes) associated with percent T25FW changes. Results: T25FW speed variability was small (within- and between-visit averages = 7.2%-8.7% and 14.4%-16.3%). Correlations between T25FW and MSWS-12 values were low (-0.20 to -0.30), but relatively stronger between their change values (-0.33 to -0.41). Speed improvements of >= 20%, and possibly 15%, were associated with clinically meaningful changes in self-reported walking ability using MSWS-12 change score and effect size criteria. Conclusions: This study builds on existing research and provides direct evidence that improvements in T25FW speed of >= 20% are meaningful to people with MS. The dalfampridine data enabled examinations previously not possible, including spontaneous and induced speed changes, speed change anchored to change in self-reported walking ability, and a profile of speed changes. Results support the T25FW as a clinically meaningful outcome measure for MS clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据